🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed order, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to use a newly configured congressional district plan that is projected to include several five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three order, released on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to set aside a federal judge's ruling that had rejected the new map in November.

Court's Rationale

The federal judge improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing significant confusion and disturbing the sensitive federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in explaining its action.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably grouped voters according to their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it passed the new maps. It had instructed the state to employ the maps drawn after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissent

With a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's action. She stated that it disregarded the work of the district court, pointing out that its ruling was actually authored by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a infraction of the U.S. Constitution.

National Redistricting Struggle

The ruling comes amid a nationwide fight over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican majority. Usually, redistricting takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that might create a number of more GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have pushed back with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State attorney general hailed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that guarantees representation favorable to Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he remarked.

Conversely, Democratic representatives decried the outcome. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the head of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another leading Democratic figure stated the court had yet again eroded its standing by upholding a race-based map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he stated.